Advances in Pure Mathematics
Vol.07 No.11(2017), Article ID:80554,2 pages
10.4236/apm.2017.711039

Erratum to “Manifolds with Bakry-Emery Ricci Curvature Bounded Below”, Advances in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 6 (2016), 754-764

Issa Allassane Kaboye1, Bazanfaré Mahaman2

1Faculté de Sciences et Techniques, Université de Zinder, Zinder, Niger

2Département de Mathématiques et Informatique, Université Abdou Moumouni, Niamey, Niger

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received: August 24, 2016; Accepted: October 14, 2016; Published: October 17, 2016


The original online version of this article (Issa Allassane Kaboye, Bazanfaré Mahaman (2016) Manifolds with Bakry-Emery Ricci Curvature bounded below 6, 754-764. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/apm.2016.611061 unfortunately contains a mistake. The author wishes to correct the errors.

Lemma 3.5. Let (M, g, e−fdvolg) be a complete smooth metric measure space with R i c f ≥ 0 ; fix p ∈ M ; if there exists c so that | f ( x ) | ≤ c then for R ≥ r > 0

V o l f ( B ( p , R ) ) V o l f ( B ( p , r ) ) ≤ e 4 c ( R r ) n

Proof

Let x be a point in M and let γ : [ 0 , r ] → M be a minimal geodesic joining p to x and ( e i ( t ) ) 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 be a parallel orthonormal vector fields along γ . Set Y i ( t ) = t r e i ( t ) .

By the second variation formula we have:

m ( r ) = Δ r ≤ ∑ i = 1 n − 1 I ( Y i , Y i ) = ∫ 0 r ( ∑ i = 1 n − 1 ‖ Y ′ i ( t ) ‖ 2 − 〈 R ( Y i ( t ) , γ ′ ( t ) ) γ ′ ( t ) , Y i ( t ) 〉 ) d t ≤ 1 r 2 ∫ 0 r ( n − 1 − t 2 R i c ( γ ' ( t ) ) ) d t

n − 1 r + ∫ 0 r t 2 r 2 H e s s ( f ) ( γ ′ , γ ′ ) d t

n − 1 r + ∫ 0 r t 2 r 2 ( f ∘ γ ) ′ ​ ′ d t = n − 1 r + 1 r 2 ∫ 0 r d d t ( t 2 ( f ∘ γ ) ′ ( t ) ) d t − 2 r 2 ∫ 0 r t ( f ∘ γ ) ′ ( t ) d t = n − 1 r + ∂ r f − 2 r f ( x ) + 2 r 2 ∫ 0 r ( f ∘ γ ) ( t ) d t

Hence

m f ( r ) = Δ r − ∂ r f = ∂ ∂ r ( ln ( A f ( r , θ ) ) ) ≤ n − 1 r + ∂ r f − 2 r f ( x ) + 2 r 2 ∫ 0 r ( f ∘ γ ) ( t ) d t

For all positive reals r and s, integrating this relation we have:

∫ r s m f ( t ) d t = ln ( A f ( s , θ ) A f ( r , θ ) ) ≤ ( s r ) n − 1 + 2 ∫ r s ( 1 t 2 ∫ 0 t f ( u ) d u − 1 t f ( t ) ) d t = ln ( s r ) n − 1 − ( 2 t ∫ 0 t f d t ) | r s + 2 ∫ r s 1 t f d t − 2 ∫ r s 1 t f d t = ln ( s r ) n − 1 − ( 2 t ∫ 0 t f d t ) | r s ≤ ln ( s r ) n − 1 + 4 c

Therefore we have r n − 1 A f ( s , θ ) ≤ e 4 c A f ( r , θ ) s n − 1 . Hence

∫ 0 R ∫ S n − 1 r n − 1 A f ( s , θ ) d θ d r ≤ e 4 c ∫ 0 R ∫ S n − 1 A f ( r , θ ) d θ d r

which implies

R n n ∫ S n − 1 A f ( s , θ ) d θ ≤ e 4 c s n − 1 ∫ 0 R ∫ S n − 1 A f ( r , θ ) d θ d r = e 4 c s n − 1 v o l f ( B ( p , R ) )

and integrating from 0 to R' with respect to s we obtain the conclusion.