Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
![]() Journal of Modern Physics, 2012, 3, 1945-1957 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2012.312243 Published Online December 2012 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/jmp) Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP Determination of the Vibro-Rotational Constants, the Dipole Moment’s Function and the Intensities of the HTO’s ν1 (ν3 by Usual Convention) Band Modou Tine1, Diouma Kobor1, Ibrahima Sakho1, Laurent Coudert2 1Laboratoire de Chimie et de Physique des Matériaux (LCPM), Université de Ziguinchor, Ziguinchor, Sénégal 2Laboratoire Inter-Universitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques, Créteil, France Email: [email protected] Received June 29, 2012; revised October 16, 2012; accepted October 30, 2012 ABSTRACT In the first part of this paper, an analysis of the high-resolution spectrum of the HTO molecule ν1(ν3) band, from 3630 to 3950 cm–1, was undertaken. The rotational transition of this band was assigned using combination differences. Their wavenumbers were analyzed with a least squares fit program in order to obtain spectroscopic constants. A perturbed state has been evidenced. In the second part, with a view towards building a spectroscopic data base, a calculation of the dipolar momentum function was undertaken. Keywords: Infrared Spectrum; Energy Level; Rays Intensities; Perturbation 1. Introduction HTO molecule is important for the environment. It is found in discharges of nuclear power plants with 12.3 years for half-life. It is essential to know its infrared spectrum in order to detect it remotely. It is also interest- ing to have available database to use this molecule spec- troscopy. These were the motivation of our work focused on the fundamental v1(v3) looks near 3700 cm–1.The aim of this paper is twofold, firstly we perform a comprehen- sive analysis of high-resolution spectrum of the v1(ν3) band, and secondly we determine the dipole moment’s function which will permit us to calculate the rays inten- sities in a wide range of quantum numbers. We continued with an analysis of the transitions wave numbers to determine the spectroscopic constants that are essential to calculate the positions of such transitions. 2. Theoretical Calculations 2.1. The Vibration-Rotation Hamiltonian Leaving from the approximations of Born Oppenheimer [1,2] and of the harmonic that consists in separating the movement of the electrons to that of the cores and in de- scribing the molecule while developing only the potential energy to the second order, with the help of the 3N-6 correctly chosen coordinates. The vibration-rotation Ham- iltonian, under compact shape, is written, according to Darling and Dennison [3], simplified by Watson [4,5], by: 2 1 1 2 1 2k k H JP JP PVQUQ (1) where the indices α and β correspond to the xyz axes of the mobile reference mark. Jα and pα quantities are re- spectively the components of the total angular moment and the internal angular moment of the vibration; μαβ represents the component of the efficient inertia tensor’s inverse; pk with 136KN the conjugated momen- tum of the normal coordinate of Qk vibration; V(Q) the potential energy (quadratic) and U(Q) a term of a poten- tial energy type. For the zero-order this Equation (1) be- comes: 0vr H HH With 322 1 1 2 vkk k H PQ (2) By introducing the dimensionless normal coordinates, we obtain: 14 12 k kk qQ and k k i pq The Equation (2) gets under the shape: 322 12 k vkk k H hcp q (3) ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1946 where 12 2π k kc is the k node energy in cm–1 and the c constant, the light speed. The Equation (3) is the sum of three harmonic oscillators. We deduce easily the wave’s function as well as the vibrational energy: 3 123 1 ,, vvkk k vvvq and 3 1 1 2 vk k Ehc v (4) where Φv(q) is the harmonic oscillator wave’s function for the vibrational quantum number v. From this equation, the values of the H2O, HDO and HTO three normal nodes energies are given in the Table 1. The calculation has been done taking into account the molecule geometry at the equilibrium state and the surface potential energy of Patridge and Schwenke [6]. To compare our results, some energy levels, coming from the results of the ref- erences [7-12], were presented in the same table. We represented the small displacements to the H2O isitopic in Figure 1. The normal modes are labeled using the IUPAC convention [13], followed in brackets by the usual convention. Hr can be written by: 2 r HBJ (5) where α corresponds to the x, y, z axes and 1 2 1 cm 8πe h BcI r H has been calculated choosing the reference related to the O’xyz molecule while the tensor of inertia would be diagonal (Figure 2). For an asymmetric molecule type, as HTO, the use is to designate by A, B and C the constants of the rotational Bα, with A > B > C. The corresponding axes have been noted a, b, c. Table 1. Calculated and observed energies of the three normal modes for the isotopic varieties of water. Variety Mode Calculated Observed ν1 3831 3655 ν2 1648 1594 H2O ν3 3942 3755 ν1 3889 3707 ν2 2824 2726 HDO ν3 1445 1403 ν1 3888 3716 ν2 2369 1648 HTO ν3 1370 1332 Figure 1. The small displacements of the three normal nodes of vibration [13] of H2O, HDO and HTO. B z H A O Oʹ T x Figure 2. The axes systems of HTO molecule. Following the Ir representation ,, x by cza the Equation (5) becomes : 222 22 22 11 22 1 4 rzxy z HAJBJCJ A BC JBCJ BC JJ (6) where 2222 x yz J JJJ and . x y J JiJ To estimate the molecule’s asymetry, we introduce the Ray parameter [14] κ, equal to –0.8. This means that the HTO molecule is enough close to a stretching asymmet- ric rotator (1 ). There is no analytical forms for the eigenvalues of the Equation (5). To obtain the rotation energy, it is neces- sary to diagonalize the matrix of this hamiltonian in the basis ,, J KM of the simultaneous eigenstates of the total angular momentum J 2 and of its projections on the laboratory Z axis and the variable z of the mobile reference, respectively, JZ and Jz. ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1947 2,,1 ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, Z z J JKMJ JJKM J JKMMJKM J JKMKJKM (7) where J, K, M is the quantum numbers corresponding to these three operators. The expression of the wave func- tion ,, J KM depends on the chosen conventions. In the present case we take the same convention of Bunker [15] and we write it as the following way: 2 21 ,, ,, 8π J KM J JKM D (8) where ii ,, ee JJ K K KM KM Dd The function J K M d is defined in the reference [16]. When the molecule is isolated, the rotational energy doesn’t depend on M and, to simplify, we use the linear combinations of the following , J K functions: ,, for0 ,, 2 ,0for 0 JKJ KK JK JK K (9) where 1 . When 0K, only the linear combina- tion with γ = +1 exists. The non zero matrix elements of the rotational Hamiltonian (Equation (5)), could exist only when the linear combinations and the Equation (9) are in the same type. That means 0, 2K and 0 . We can write the rotational Hamiltonian eigen- functions as followed: ,,, nn vK KaJK (10) where n is a quantum number varying from 0 to 2J and where , n K a the related coefficients of the developping wave’s functions. Rather than to use the quantum number n to identify the rotation levels, we prefer to use the pseudo quantum numbers a K and c K of the rotation [17]. Although these latters are not real quantum num- bers, all of the three quantum numbers J , a K and c K with 0, a K J0c K J and or 1 ac KKJ J (11) permit to, unequivocally, identify the 21 J rotation levels corresponding to a value of J . Indeed, we have ac nJKK . r E the rotation energy of the J , a K , c K level, we can write: ,, ,, ac ac J KK JKK rr rr HE (12) The Figure 3 shows the arrangement of first levels of rotation of HTO. We will notice that the energy espe- cially depends on J and a K . Two levels, character- 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2 02 3 03 4 04 1 01 0 00 1 10 1 11 2 12 2 11 3 13 3 12 2 20 2 21 Figure 3. Diagram of rotations energies levels of HTO. ized by the same values of these two quantum numbers with different c K values, have slightly different ener- gies because of the asymmetry duplication. This latter increases with J but decreases with a K and it is re- sulting from the fact that BC. So the Hamiltonian of zero-order becomes: 123 ,,,, 0123 ,,,, ,ac vv vJKK ac rr vv v JKK (13) 2.1.1. Watson’s Hamiltonian The above given results are only valid in the setting of the zero order approximation. In order to consider the centrifugal distortion effects, we will use the Watson’s Hamiltonian [18-20]. However in this equation the rota- tional energy is not the eigenvalue of the rotational Ham- iltonian of the Equation (6) but the eigenvalue of the ef- ficient Hamiltonian depending only on the angular mo- mentum of the rotation. 222 4224 2226 24 42 642242 8 264462 8 624426 , , vvvv vv rzxyKzKJzJ vvv vv Kz JxyKzKJzJKz vvv vv JKzKJzJxyKz vvvv KKJz KJz KJJz J vv v v Kz KJz JKz J HAJBJCJJJJ J JJJHJHJJHJJ HJhJ hJJ hJJLJ LJJLJJ LJJLJ lJ lJJ lJJ lJ 2 102 84 664 82 10 826446282 , , xy vvv v KzKKKKJ zKKJ zKJJ z vv KJJJz J vvv vv K z KKJz KJ zKJJz Jxy J PJPJ JPJJPJ J PJJ PJ pJpJJpJJ pJJ pJJ (14) ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1948 where 222 x yxy J JJ and {,} is the ant-commutator as , A BABBA. In this equation, all parameters depend on the consid- ered vibrationnal state as indicated by the exhibitor v. The adopted resolution is the A-type which is more ade- quate for an asymmetric molecule as HTO. 390 transitions have been assigned for J values below 15 (Table 2). 2.1.2. The Wave Numbers For every transition, characterized by the rotationnal quantum numbers ,, ac J KK and ,, ac J KK for the lower and higher levels, respectively, the wave number cal has been calculated by: 10 10 ,,: ,,: cal racrac vv E JK KPEJ KKP EE (15) Table 2. The transitions assigned in the infrared spectrum of the ν1(ν3) band of HTO. J' a K c K J" a K c K Obs Cal Diff 2 1 6 3 2 5 5 0 4 5 5 1 8 1 4 1 3 3 2 11 11 2 6 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 8 8 1 8 8 6 6 6 6 5 5 4 9 9 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 2 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 5 5 0 2 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 6 6 0 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 1 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 6 3 2 5 4 0 4 5 3 0 7 1 3 1 3 3 2 7 6 2 5 6 5 5 4 4 3 5 5 3 2 1 4 3 0 1 1 2 0 1 4 7 5 5 4 3 2 3 1 2 3 2 6 4 3 5 4 1 4 5 4 2 8 2 5 2 3 2 3 11 11 2 5 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 8 8 1 8 8 6 6 6 6 5 5 3 9 9 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 2 1 1 0 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 5 5 1 3 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 6 6 1 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 5 4 3 4 1 1 3 4 2 1 6 2 4 2 2 0 3 6 7 1 2 5 6 4 5 3 4 4 5 2 3 0 3 4 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 6 6 4 3 4 3 2 2 1 3678.521(10) 3678.849(10) 3680.963(10) 3682.342(10) 3683.105(10) 3683.710(10) 3686.775(10) 3688.956(10) 3689.717(10) 3690.777(10) 3690.777(50) 3690.937(10) 3691.777(10) 3693.354(10) 3693.994(10) 3694.065(50) 3694.102(10) 3694.970(10) 3695.623(10) 3696.543(10) 3696.643(10) 3697.093(10) 3697.172(10) 3697.518(10) 3697.518(10) 3697.708(10) 3697.708(10) 3698.242(10) 3698.242(10) 3698.360(10) 3698.360(10) 3698.658(10) 3698.658(10) 3698.941(10) 3699.149(10) 3699.149(10) 3699.524(10) 3699.524(10) 3700.508(10) 3700.508(10) 3701.061(10) 3701.061(10) 3702.410(50) 3702.935(10) 3702.935(10) 3703.183(10) 3703.817(10) 3703.879(10) 3704.358(50) 3704.358(50) 3704.817(10) 3704.817(10) 3721.521 3658.849 3692.963 3704.342 3696.105 3669.710 3549.775 3660.956 3687.717 3698.777 3714.777 3693.937 4057.777 3679.354 3603.994 3688.065 3686.102 3694.970 3695.623 3678.543 3680.643 3680.093 3392.172 3665.518 3703.518 3714.708 3715.708 3655.242 3655.242 3693.360 3703.360 3719.658 3719.658 3665.941 3699.149 3702.149 3702.524 3702.524 3697.508 3697.508 3694.061 3694.061 3694.410 3718.935 3664.935 3699.183 3709.817 3711.879 3738.358 3720.358 3731.817 3727.817 −43 20 −12 −22 −13 14 137* 28 2 −8 −24 −3 −362* 14 90* 6 8 0 0 18 16 17 305* 32 −6 −17 −18 43 43 5 −5 −21 −21 33 0 −3 −3 −3 3 3 7 7 8 −16 38 4 −6 −8 −34 −16 −27 −23 6 2 4 5 3 3 3704.817(50) 3733.817 −29 ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1949 Continued 3 0 4 4 6 8 3 7 5 6 1 5 1 0 4 4 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 2 0 0 1 5 6 3 5 5 4 1 4 2 1 4 4 6 8 3 7 4 6 2 5 2 0 4 4 2 3 1 3 2 3 0 2 1 1 1 0 4 5 2 4 2 3 2 3 3704.857(50) 3704.939(50) 3705.197(10) 3705.197(10) 3705.219(10) 3705.518(10) 3705.744(50) 3707.199(10) 3708.150(50) 3708.254(10) 3708.554(10) 3708.930(50) 3722.857 3684.939 3676.197 3734.197 3417.219 3714.518 3724.744 3713.199 3705.150 3723.254 3724.554 3584.930 −18 20 29 −29 288* −9 −19 −6 3 −15 −16 124* 5 6 4 4 3 3 8 2 4 6 3 2 2 3 1 4 5 5 1 4 4 6 2 2 2 7 3 1 8 4 4 1 5 2 4 3 2 3 5 2 2 4 1 5 6 3 3 3 4 6 3 3 2 6 6 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 1 1 0 5 2 3 6 2 1 0 1 1 2 3 3 0 3 2 4 1 2 1 5 2 1 6 3 2 0 4 1 1 3 2 2 4 2 1 3 1 4 5 3 2 1 4 5 3 2 2 5 4 5 5 6 4 4 3 3 8 2 4 5 3 2 2 3 1 4 5 5 1 3 5 6 2 1 3 7 3 0 8 4 5 1 4 2 5 2 1 3 5 1 1 4 0 5 6 2 2 2 3 5 2 2 1 6 6 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 2 1 2 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 4 1 2 0 1 6 1 2 3 1 0 1 2 0 3 4 4 1 2 5 5 2 1 2 6 3 0 7 4 3 1 3 2 4 2 1 3 5 1 0 4 0 5 6 2 1 0 3 4 2 1 1 6 5 6 3708.930(50) 3709.119(10) 3709.373(10) 3709.430(50) 3709.685(50) 3709.695(50) 3710.114(10) 3710.775(10) 3711.338(10) 3711.866(50) 3712.651(10) 3713.257(50) 3713.496(10) 3713.832(50) 3714.137(10) 3714.756(10) 3716.657(10) 3716.657(10) 3717.367(10) 3719.221(10) 3719.327(10) 3719.865(10) 3720.452(50) 3723.518(10) 3724.079(10) 3724.568(10) 3725.042(10) 3728.149(10) 3730.842(10) 3731.131(10) 3721.577(10) 3733.357(10) 3734.056(10) 3734.942(50) 3735.299(50) 3736.028(10) 3737.204(10) 3737.549(10) 3738.615(10) 3739.500(10) 3740.513(10) 3741.318(50) 3743.338(10) 3746.505(10) 3747.373(10) 3747.668(10) 3748.046(10) 3748.544(10) 3748.608(10) 3749.199(10) 3750.541(10) 3752.710(10) 3753.185(10) 3753.185(50) 3754.397(10) 3754.468(10) 3720.930 3744.119 3716.373 3734.430 3700.685 3701.695 3737.114 3722.775 3638.338 3672.866 3699.257 3742.257 3739.496 3694.832 3714.137 3685.756 3692.657 3692.657 3709.367 3728.221 3692.327 3700.865 3713.452 3698.518 3725.079 3716.568 3735.042 3712.149 3718.842 3740.131 3693.577 3725.357 3735.056 3748.942 3723.299 3719.028 3737.204 3744.549 3753.615 3723.500 3750.513 3770.318 3747.338 3762.505 3765.373 3759.668 3725.046 3738.544 3739.608 3755.199 3732.541 3764.710 3763.185 3753.185 3742.397 3754.468 −12 −35 −7 −25 9 8 −27 −12 73* 39 13 −29 −26 19 0 29 24 24 8 −9 27 19 7 25 −1 8 −10 36 12 −9 28 8 −1 −14 12 17 0 −7 −15 16 −10 −29 −4 −16 −18 −12 23 10 9 −6 18 −12 −10 0 12 0 5 2 3 5 1 4 3755.434(10) 3730.434 25 ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1950 Continued 8 4 4 4 4 9 3 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 6 2 1 2 4 9 1 8 3 3 4 3 7 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 7 1 0 3 3 8 2 3755.919(10) 3755.994(50) 3756.024(50) 3757.218(10) 3757.948(10) 3758.901(10) 3759.322(50) 3746.919 3740.994 3746.024 3735.218 3773.948 3850.901 3764.322 9 15 8 22 −16 8 −5 4 4 5 4 7 2 3 5 5 10 7 4 2 5 5 5 3 6 6 11 4 5 8 5 4 10 5 6 6 6 5 9 5 12 6 5 6 6 6 8 6 7 7 6 7 7 6 6 2 6 7 2 6 5 7 7 4 4 3 5 7 6 8 7 2 2 0 0 1 2 1 4 4 2 1 1 2 3 3 1 2 5 5 3 1 2 1 0 2 3 2 0 4 4 2 3 1 2 1 1 3 3 2 3 0 5 5 2 3 0 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 0 3 3 2 5 4 6 0 3 1 2 8 6 3 1 3 2 5 2 2 1 8 4 4 7 5 3 7 3 6 2 3 4 6 4 10 6 5 4 3 5 5 6 3 2 5 4 7 4 6 1 3 7 0 5 2 7 4 1 2 1 3 7 4 8 5 3 3 4 3 7 2 2 4 4 10 6 3 2 4 4 4 3 5 5 11 3 4 8 4 4 10 4 5 5 5 5 9 4 12 5 4 5 5 6 8 5 6 6 5 7 6 5 5 1 6 6 1 5 5 6 6 4 4 3 5 6 6 7 7 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 4 4 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 5 5 2 0 2 0 0 1 2 2 1 4 4 1 2 1 1 1 0 3 3 1 2 0 5 5 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 3 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 2 2 1 4 3 7 1 2 0 1 9 5 2 2 2 1 4 3 1 0 9 3 3 8 4 4 8 2 5 1 2 5 7 3 11 5 4 3 2 6 6 5 2 1 4 5 6 3 5 0 4 6 1 4 3 6 3 2 3 2 4 6 5 7 6 3759.322(50) 3760.535(10) 3760.953(10) 3761.107(10) 3761.276(10) 3761.348(10) 3762.176(10) 3762.870(10) 3762.870(10) 3763.546(10) 3764.473(10) 3764.730(10) 3765.979(10) 3767.325(10) 3765.453(10) 3768.021(10) 3768.228(10) 3769.881(10) 3769.881(10) 3770.189(10) 3770.439(50) 3770.439(50) 3770.593(10) 3771.163(10) 3771.245(10) 3772.669(10) 3772.777(10) 3772.819(10) 3774.061(10) 3774.061(10) 3775.010(10) 3776.061(10) 3776.516(10) 3777.718(10) 3777.858(10) 3778.226(10) 3778.610(10) 3778.950(10) 3779.601(10) 3779.904(10) 3780.716(10) 3780.874(10) 3780.874(10) 3781.421(10) 3783.693(10) 3784.088(10) 3785.251(10) 3785.755(10) 3786.069(10) 3787.024(10) 3787.478(10) 3787.775(10) 3787.963(10) 3789.632(10) 3789.883(10) 3790.601(10) 3791.438(10) 3793.025(10) 3793.088(10) 3793.165(10) 3793.274(10) 3793.617(10) 3794.388(10) 3794.499(10) 3676.322 3743.535 3748.953 3757.107 3770.276 3783.348 3778.176 3780.870 3776.870 3749.546 3763.473 3779.730 3783.979 3773.325 3774.453 3777.021 3740.228 3805.881 3805.881 3762.189 3799.439 3601.439 3768.593 3756.163 3675.245 3781.669 3779.777 3734.819 3800.061 3791.061 3608.010 3793.061 3786.516 3765.718 3781.858 3789.226 3789.610 3801.950 3450.601 3794.904 3735.716 3778.874 3778.874 3446.421 3802.693 3677.088 3770.251 3784.755 3793.069 3800.024 3767.478 3809.775 3805.963 3789.632 3680.883 3802.601 3777.601 3781.025 3763.088 3791.165 3770.274 3796.617 3653.388 3793.499 83* 17 12 4 − 9 −22 −16 −18 −16 14 1 −15 −18 −6 −9 −9 28 −36 −36 8 −29 169* 2 15 96* −9 7 38 −26 −17 167* −17 −10 12 −4 −11 −11 −23 329* −15 45 2 2 335* −19 107* 15 1 −7 −13 20 −22 −18 0 109* −12 14 12 30 2 23 −3 141* 1 ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1951 where i v E is the vibrationnal energy of the i state and ,, : i rac EJKK P represents the rotational energy of the J, Ka, Kc level, calculated with the efficient Hamilto- nian given by the Equation (14) for the i P spectro- scopic parameter of the i vibrationnal state. In this work, the 0 P spectroscopic parameters of the fundamental state have been considered equal to the Helminger’s values published in [21] and 0 v E arbitrarily fixed at zero. The 1 P spectroscopic parameters of the vibrationnal state v1 = 1 has been determined by adjust- ment using the least squares program. The results of the analysis are in the Tables 2 and 3. 2.2. The ν1(ν3) Band Intensity To calculate the transitions intensity, it is necessary for us to determine, at first, the dipolar momentum function. 2.2.1. Determination of the Dipolar Momentum Function From the S1 and S2 coordinates corresponding respec- tively to the following small variations ∆r31 and ∆r32 of the inter atomic distances and S3 corresponding to small variations of the valence angle ∆Φ, the Schrödinger equation for the vibration [22] becomes: 33 ,1 ,1 11 22 vijijijij ij ij H GPPFSS (16) where i i i PS is the conjugated momentum of the co- ordinate i S, G and F correspond respectively to the kinetic and potential energies and can be calculated nu- merically from the Wilson Equation [22] once the mole- cule’s equilibrium configuration is known. The F tensor components can be calculated numerically using Patridge and Schwenke [6] potential energy surface. The v H eigenenergies were obtained by solving the following equation: 1 F XGX (17) where and X are respectively eigenvalue and ei- genvector. Thus we can deduce the equation permitting the pas- sage from normal dimensionless coordinates k q to the internal coordinates. 3 14 1 k i ik k k X Sq (18) Then we try to obtain the dipolar momentum function according to the internal coordinates: 3 0 1 ssi x xxi iS and 3 0 1 ssi z zzi iS (19) Table 3. The spectroscopic constants of the fundamental and the v1(v3) band of HTO. Constant value to the ν1(ν3) band Constant value to the fundamental E1 3716.5475(48) E0 0 A B C 21.8482(37) 6.58908(75) 4.97656(72) A B C 22.61061 6.61116 5.01889 ∆K ∆KJ ∆J δK δJ 13.796(810) × 10–3 2.306(130) × 10–3 0.1628(71) × 10–3 –6.710(320) × 10–3 16.670(390) × 10–6 ∆K ∆KJ ∆J δK δJ 9.04872 × 10–3 1.61856 × 10–3 0.17385 × 10–3 1.71208 × 10–3 47.1697 × 10–6 HK HKJ HJK HJ hK hKJ hJ 888.900(680) × 10–6 127.500(160) × 10–6 –24.000(18) × 10–6 –0.224(64) × 10–6 –894.900(360 × 10–6 –35.500(270) × 10–6 –0.140(16) × 10–6 HK HKJ HJK HJ hK hKJ hJ 29.880 × 10–6 –2.110 × 10–6 1.316 × 10–6 17.337 × 10–9 17.947 × 10–6 0.5713 × 10–6 5.946 × 10–9 LK LKKJ LKJ –0.277 × 10–6 0.0659 × 10–6 –0.018 × 10–6 lK lKJ –0.2713 × 10–6 –3.0395 × 10–9 PK 3.673 × 10–9 LK LKKJ LKJ LKJJ LJ IK IKJ IJK PK PKKKJ pK –20.000(24) × 10–6 –11.130(50) × 10–6 1.906(120) × 10–6 0.0831(90) × 10–6 0.404(180) × 10–9 29.781(1600) × 10–6 0.924(80) × 10–6 89.840(760) × 10–9 238.400(300) × 10–9 115.200(100) × 10–9 –196.900(150) × 10–9 pK 0.969 × 10–9 ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1952 where 0s with or x z and s i with 13i are constants. To determine the HTO dipolar momentum function, we use the unvariability of this function with an isotopic substitution when it is expressed by the internal coordi- nates. However, it will be necessary to take to account the way from which the molecule depending reference mark O’xyz is going to change. From the Equation (18) and by replacing the Si by the qi in the Equation (19), we find the HTO dipolar mo- mentum function expressed in the normal dimensionless coordinates. Considering the Equation (18), the terms k i X and k will have the values corresponding to the HTO normal modes and the results are shown in the Ta- ble 4. 2.2.2. The Absorption Band Intensity The intensity of a molecular absorption band, in a gas at the thermodynamic equilibrium [23], is given as fol- lowed: 3 36 2 8π10 exp 3 1exp BAAB A A AB Z g hcE ShcQ KT hc AB KT (20) where B A S is the intensity in cm–1/(molécule·cm–2) for a transition from the lower level A to the up level B at the T temperature; A g is the degenerancy due to the nu- clear spin of the lower level A; AB is the transition wave number in cm–1; A E is the lower energy level in 1 cm; Q the distribu- tion’s function; K the Boltzmann’s constant and Z is the modified transition momentum in Debye. Its expres- sion [23] is: Z xx zz (21) where x and z are the dipolar momentum compo- nents, in the reference mark related to the molecule, ex- pressed according to the normal dimensionless coordi- nates. x and z are operators [23] depending to the vibrational coordinates which matrix elements are given in the Tables 5 and 6. From the Tables 3 and 5, the wave number and the Table 4. Thevalues of the coefficients used in the develop- ment of the dipolar momentum function. Coefficients Valeur Coefficients Valeur 0 x –1.74117 0 z –0.84923 1 x × 21/2 –0.01060 1 z × 21/2 –0.03502 2 x × 21/2 0.10583 2 z × 21/2 –0.05269 3 x × 21/2 –0.03039 3 z × 21/2 0.04091 intensity of the authorized transitions have been calcu- lated using Equations (15) and (20), for 11J , for a temperature of 296 K. The Table 7 gives the portion of list covering the re- gion 3630 to 3760 cm–1 for the transitions which inten- sity is over 23 12 10cmmolecule cm . 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Analysis of Waves Numbers In this analysis, the efficient hamiltonian spectroscopic parameters of the Equation (14) and the vibrational en- ergy have been considered. The mean quadratic gap q = 0.018 cm–1 is enough close to the experimental one for the observed wave number: 0.010 cm–1. It is also possible to evaluate the quality of the analysis with the standard deviation σ = 1.7. Ideally, this value should be very close to 1. This excess can be the consequence of the underestimation of the experimental uncertainties and the use of an unadequate efficient Hamiltonian. In this latter, it can come from a perturbation of the superior vibrationnal state. This hy- pothesis is confirmed by the results in the Table 2 for the transitions presenting a big gap (Obs.-Cal.) or even those that have been excluded in the analysis (in asterisk in the Table 2). One realizes that these transitions often share the same superior rotationnal level and that the gap (Obs.-Cal.) is practically independent of the low level. The Table 8 illustrates well this fact for transitions ex- cluded in the analysis for which the superior rotationnal levels are 808 and 625. Presumably, the vibrationnal state v1 = 1 is not isolated. It exists another closed vibrationnal state which is cou- pled whith it. To make a correct calculation of the vibra- tionnal energy, it would be necessary to treat simultane- ously these two states. A calculation based on Table 1 Table 5. The non zero elements matrix [23] operator Φz. ∆J ∆K Γ , , , , z JKJ K 0 0 12 21 1KJ JJ ±1 0 12 22 –Km Km Table 6. The non zero elements matrix [23] operator Φx. ∆J∆KΓ , , , , z JKJ K 0±1 12 121 11 2JJKKJKKJJ ±1 ±1 12 11 2JKm KKmKKm ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1953 Table 7. Waves numbers and lines intensities of v1(v3) band of HTO. J' a K c K J" a K c K Cal S 2 2 1 7 2 9 3 5 11 7 10 11 8 5 8 0 10 9 4 5 5 1 11 8 8 11 4 1 9 11 4 1 3 3 2 8 8 8 11 11 6 2 9 11 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 3 3 4 3 2 3 0 4 3 0 1 2 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 1 3 8 8 5 5 2 0 3 6 6 5 5 6 6 6 6 8 8 5 5 9 9 6 6 1 1 1 6 2 8 3 5 8 5 7 7 6 4 5 0 6 6 4 5 3 0 11 7 7 11 4 1 6 9 3 1 3 3 2 5 1 0 7 6 5 2 7 6 5 6 5 5 4 4 3 2 1 5 4 0 1 3 2 3 3 2 6 3 9 2 5 10 8 11 10 7 4 7 1 11 10 4 5 4 2 10 8 7 10 3 2 10 11 5 2 3 2 3 9 9 9 11 11 5 2 8 11 11 10 10 10 10 9 9 10 10 9 9 10 10 8 8 1 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 5 2 2 5 4 3 4 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 2 2 3 2 2 0 3 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 8 8 5 5 3 1 4 6 6 5 5 6 6 6 6 8 8 5 5 10 10 6 6 2 2 2 3 3 7 0 4 5 6 10 6 3 1 4 1 9 9 3 4 2 1 8 6 4 8 1 2 7 8 4 2 2 0 3 5 2 1 6 7 2 1 4 5 6 5 6 4 5 3 4 3 2 4 5 1 0 2 3 3678.528 3678.564 3678.828 3679.121 3683.118 3683.043 3683.299 3683.695 3684.293 3684.665 3685.350 3685.575 3685.976 3686.796 3688.519 3688.927 3689.439 3689.711 3689.714 3690.785 3690.802 3690.941 3692.047 3691.788 3692.310 3692.615 3693.035 3693.340 3693.679 3693.883 3693.985 3694.058 3694.093 3694.968 3695.622 3696.172 3696.388 3696.388 3696.552 3696.653 3697.186 3697.075 3697.116 3697.356 3697.359 3697.498 3697.537 3697.724 3697.725 3698.201 3698.201 3698.205 3698.205 3698.358 3698.371 3698.568 3698.568 3698.679 3698.679 6.47e−20 3.24e−20 2.22e−19 1.00e−22 6.79e−20 1.34e−21 7.21e−23 2.59e−19 1.31e−21 1.67e−20 2.63e−21 1.31e−21 6.99e−21 1.60e−20 7.03e−21 1.65e−19 2.45e−21 5.18e−21 3.32e−19 5.34e−21 1.65e−20 4.38e−20 3.26e−21 2.66e−21 1.28e−22 9.26e−22 2.21e−22 6.41e−20 4.01e−21 5.50e−22 5.86e−20 4.49e−20 3.70e−19 1.73e−20 1.67e−19 8.99e−21 3.63e−23 3.63e−23 5.29e−22 5.29e−22 1.96e−20 3.45e−19 5.87e−21 3.24e−22 3.24e−22 1.08e−21 1.08e−21 6.62e−22 6.62e−22 1.29e−21 1.29e−21 3.99e−23 3.99e−23 2.11e−21 2.11e−21 2.66e−23 2.66e−23 2.39e−21 2.39e−21 1 4 7 7 0 1 6 6 1 4 2 1 1 4 7 7 1 1 6 6 0 3 1 2 3698.907 3699.079 3699.123 3699.123 2.46e−19 8.72e−21 4.26e−21 4.26e−21 ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1954 Continued 8 7 7 11 6 6 10 5 5 5 9 6 10 10 9 4 9 11 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 9 7 6 6 5 5 6 3 0 6 4 4 8 9 3 7 9 6 10 10 7 9 10 5 6 1 5 5 8 6 5 3 7 4 4 8 7 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 0 5 5 0 4 3 1 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 1 3 4 4 4 4 2 1 0 2 4 4 3 3 1 2 0 0 8 8 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 3 4 3 2 8 2 1 10 1 0 5 5 4 10 7 6 4 6 7 6 5 7 5 4 4 3 8 4 3 2 2 1 4 2 0 5 1 0 6 6 3 6 9 6 3 2 5 9 8 5 4 1 4 3 5 3 2 2 4 2 1 8 7 1 0 0 8 7 7 11 6 6 9 5 5 4 10 7 9 10 8 3 9 11 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 8 8 6 6 5 5 5 2 1 6 4 4 8 10 3 6 8 5 11 11 7 8 9 4 6 2 5 5 9 6 5 4 7 4 4 7 6 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 2 5 5 2 3 2 2 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 3 2 0 2 4 4 3 1 1 3 2 2 8 8 3 2 4 2 3 0 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 7 1 2 7 0 1 2 8 5 7 6 5 1 5 8 7 6 6 4 5 3 4 5 7 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 4 0 1 5 9 2 3 6 3 4 3 4 6 5 2 3 2 3 2 6 5 3 3 5 1 2 5 4 0 1 1 3699.147 3699.863 3699.864 3700.237 3700.500 3700.500 3700.500 3701.048 3701.048 3701.056 3701.063 3701.368 3701.418 3701.470 3701.986 3702.401 3702.414 3702.529 3702.573 3702.899 3702.953 3703.180 3703.370 3703.825 3703.889 3703.941 3704.346 3704.376 3704.393 3704.842 3704.845 3704.847 3704.876 3704.918 3705.251 3705.227 3705.227 3705.528 3705.534 3705.763 3706.308 3706.420 3706.744 3706.895 3706.895 3707.206 3707.885 3707.903 3708.146 3708.269 3708.570 3708.964 3708.943 3709.016 3709.155 3709.242 3709.316 3709.370 3709.380 3709.456 3709.349 3709.746 3709.676 3709.687 3709.687 3.94e−21 7.03e−21 7.03e−21 6.63e−22 1.21e−21 1.21e−20 7.10e−21 2.00e−20 2.00e−20 3.72e−22 3.95e−21 2.00e−20 2.13e−21 1.38e−21 5.92e−21 2.87e−20 2.72e−21 6.65e−22 1.38e−21 2.72e−21 2.47e−21 5.10e−21 5.10e−21 9.14e−21 9.14e−21 1.34e−22 1.36e−20 1.57e−20 1.57e−20 2.62e−20 2.62e−20 2.09e−20 2.33e−20 3.60e−20 9.30e−21 4.28e−20 4.28e−20 4.79e−21 1.63e−23 1.43e−20 1.90e−20 1.41e−22 4.28e−22 3.13e−23 3.13e−23 8.77e−21 4.60e−21 4.37e−21 3.01e−20 1.53e−20 9.17e−20 1.62e−20 2.57e−20 5.76e−21 1.53e−20 2.57e−20 4.58e−20 8.78e−21 4.21e−20 4.21e−20 2.48e−22 3.66e−22 6.87e−20 6.87e−20 6.87e−20 ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1955 Continued 8 2 4 9 8 6 6 3 7 7 8 2 7 7 10 10 2 3 6 1 10 10 8 4 5 8 8 8 7 10 8 5 6 5 8 1 11 9 9 11 4 4 6 7 11 9 2 5 9 10 10 7 2 2 5 7 3 7 3 10 9 4 10 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 2 7 7 1 5 2 2 3 1 5 3 2 2 2 7 7 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 1 3 7 7 3 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 7 7 4 0 2 3 2 1 4 2 2 5 2 2 5 2 3 6 8 6 4 2 5 7 4 1 1 0 9 6 0 1 3 1 5 7 7 2 3 2 1 6 5 7 5 3 4 3 6 0 9 3 2 8 3 2 4 5 10 7 1 3 8 4 3 4 2 1 2 5 2 3 1 9 5 2 8 8 2 4 9 7 5 7 3 8 6 9 2 7 7 9 11 2 3 7 1 11 10 7 4 6 8 8 9 8 9 9 5 7 6 9 1 10 9 9 11 3 5 6 6 10 10 2 6 8 10 10 8 1 3 6 7 3 8 4 9 10 5 11 3 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 7 7 3 4 2 2 2 1 4 3 3 2 1 7 7 1 0 4 1 2 0 2 0 1 4 7 7 3 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 0 3 7 7 3 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 3 4 0 1 6 1 2 7 5 3 7 1 8 4 7 0 0 1 6 7 1 2 6 0 8 8 4 3 6 1 2 9 8 6 8 4 7 4 9 1 6 2 3 9 2 5 5 4 7 10 2 6 5 3 4 5 1 2 5 6 2 6 4 6 6 5 11 3710.140 3710.787 3711.346 3711.777 3711.699 3711.826 3712.596 3712.637 3712.803 3713.116 3713.161 3713.286 3713.305 3713.305 3713.361 3713.442 3713.523 3713.812 3713.825 3714.137 3714.491 3714.599 3714.328 3714.727 3714.819 3715.312 3715.312 3715.443 3715.547 3716.434 3716.471 3716.633 3716.660 3717.007 3717.241 3717.358 3718.141 3718.468 3718.468 3718.865 3719.231 3719.300 3719.846 3719.889 3719.979 3720.385 3720.445 3720.612 3721.537 3723.159 3723.159 3723.377 3723.493 3724.080 3724.242 3724.560 3725.053 3725.511 3725.722 3726.797 3727.181 3727.190 3727.394 4.81e−21 2.45e−20 2.74e−20 2.50e−21 9.11e−21 2.42e−20 1.30e−20 4.53e−20 7.01e−21 1.60e−20 5.72e−21 7.74e−20 2.10e−21 2.10e−21 1.15e−22 1.14e−21 7.74e−20 4.54e−20 1.79e−20 4.97e−20 1.14e−21 1.23e−21 1.55e−20 2.75e−20 2.10e−20 1.19e−21 1.19e−21 3.39e−21 4.75e−23 4.50e−21 2.30e−23 1.64e−20 8.90e−23 2.10e−20 2.12e−23 5.01e−20 2.93e−21 6.41e−22 6.41e−22 5.71e−22 4.78e−20 2.80e−20 9.53e−21 2.17e−20 8.08e−23 1.52e−21 2.51e−20 1.32e−22 1.10e−20 3.31e−22 3.31e−21 7.36e−21 9.64e−20 2.42e−20 1.99e−20 5.33e−21 1.51e−20 7.34e−21 2.86e−20 6.77e−21 1.71e−21 1.44e−22 6.52e−22 ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1956 Continued 9 1 7 11 11 11 8 4 4 11 1 2 5 2 4 8 3 3 6 2 3 6 10 10 9 5 2 8 2 8 4 1 6 3 2 5 3 10 10 6 3 5 0 3 2 7 7 2 1 3 3 1 2 1 1 3 2 2 0 4 1 1 4 9 9 2 1 0 5 1 5 1 1 3 3 2 1 3 6 6 1 1 4 1 4 10 5 4 6 3 2 8 0 0 4 1 1 6 1 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 7 4 2 4 1 3 3 1 3 1 0 4 0 5 4 5 3 10 0 8 10 11 11 8 4 5 10 1 3 4 2 5 7 4 2 7 1 3 7 11 11 9 5 1 9 1 9 4 0 7 4 3 5 4 11 11 6 2 4 0 1 3 7 7 2 1 2 4 0 1 2 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 0 3 10 10 2 1 0 4 1 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 5 5 1 1 7 0 7 7 4 5 7 4 3 7 1 3 3 2 4 5 4 2 4 1 3 5 2 1 8 5 1 5 0 6 4 0 6 2 3 5 3 6 4 6 2 3727.680 3728.112 3729.425 3729.787 3729.968 3729.968 3730.828 3731.141 3731.549 3731.999 3731.349 3733.700 3734.058 3734.957 3735.287 3735.852 3735.929 3736.011 3736.954 3737.204 3737.557 3737.943 3738.286 3738.286 3738.589 3738.631 3739.483 3740.514 3740.524 3740.731 3741.348 3743.343 3743.732 3745.083 3746.205 3746.522 3746.720 3746.854 3746.897 3747.392 3747.680 1.71e−21 3.83e−20 2.69e−23 3.67e−21 1.63e−22 1.63e−22 2.98e−21 9.50e−21 1.80e−20 3.12e−21 2.71e−19 1.85e−20 6.69e−20 3.84e−19 1.75e−20 1.98e−20 1.07e−22 1.89e−16 8.09e−21 8.04e−20 4.21e−19 8.08e−21 1.49e−23 1.49e−23 1.51e−21 6.07e−21 7.26e−20 2.27e−21 5.01e−20 2.27e−21 3.91e−19 1.92e−19 2.61e−23 1.01e−20 4.39e−23 3.18e−19 9.99e−21 3.67e−22 3.67e−22 3.86e−21 8.08e−20 Table 8. Putting in evidence of the perturbations in the v1(v3) band of HTO spectrum. J' a K c K J" a K c K Obs Cal Diff 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 9 8 7 7 6 7 7 5 6 6 1 0 1 1 0 3 2 1 3 2 1 9 9 7 7 7 4 6 6 5 4 6 3614.632 3616.432 3655.075 3794.388 3598.449 3627.371 3632.055 3661.947 3697.172 3705.219 3779.601 3759.632 3759.432 3821.075 3934.388 3741.449 3303.371 3295.055 3339.947 3390.172 3415.219 3448.601 –145 –143 –166 –140 –143 324 337 322 307 290 331 shows that the closest vibrational state is the state v2 = v3 = 1 (v1= v2 = 1), which energy is estimated to 3739 cm–1. 3.2. Discussion The determination of the the dipolar momentum compo- nents (Table 5) of HTO by the so-called isotopic substi- tution method allowed us to calculate rays intensities in the ν1(ν3) band. The experimental rays intensities have not been deter- mined simultaneously with the spectrum record. For this reason only theoretical values are shown in Table 7. In contrast, it should be noted that in the case high excited levels transitions, the calculated energy level has been replaced by its observed value. In summary, to estimate the quality of the database generated for HTO, there is shown, in Figure 4, some of ![]() M. TINE ET AL. Copyright © 2012 SciRes. JMP 1957 3710 3712 3714 3716 3718 3720 Figure 4. Spectrum observed (dash) and calculated (point) of the v1(v3) band of HTO. the observed spectra (dash) and calculated (point). It can be noticed that the results are satisfactory. 4. Conclusions The satisfactory analysis in terms waves rotational num- bers of the ν1(ν3) band permitted us to make in evidence a perturbation of the high vibrationnal state. Also, the theoretical calculation of the dipole momentum function allowed us to calculate the non measured intensities of this band’s transitions. Finally, as announced in the introduction, these results permit us to create a HTO spectroscopy database. REFERENCES [1] M. Born and J. R. “Oppenheimer, Quantum Theory of the Molecules,” Annalen der Physik, Vol. 84, 1927, pp. 457- 484. doi:10.1002/andp.19273892002 [2] A. Messiah, “Mécanique Quantique,” Dunod, Paris, 1964. [3] B. T. Darling and D. M. Dennison, “The Water Vapor Mo- lecule,” Physical Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, 1940, pp. 128- 139. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.57.128 [4] J. K. G. Watson, “Simplification of the Molecular Vibra- tion-Rotation Hamiltonian,” Molecular Physics, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1968, pp. 479-490. doi:10.1080/00268976800101381 [5] G. Amat, H. H. Nielsen and G. Tarrago, “Vibration-Rota- tion Polyatomique of Molecules,” Dekker, New York, 1971. [6] H. Patridge and D. W. Schwenke, “The Determination of an Accurate Isotope Dependent Potential Energy Surface for Water from Extensive Ab Initio Calculations and Ex- perimental Data,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 106, No. 11, 1997, pp. 4618-4639. doi:10.1063/1.473987 [7] A. Perrin, J. M. Flaud and C. Camy-Peyret, “Calculated Energy Levels and Intensities for the ν1 and 2ν2 Bands of HDO,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 112, No. 1, 1985, pp. 153-162. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(85)90200-0 [8] J. M. Flaud, C. Camy-Peyret and J. P. Millard, “Higher Ro-Vibrational Levels of H2O Deduced from High Reso- lution Oxygen-Hydrogen Flame Spectra between 2800 - 6200 cm−1,” Molecular Physics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1976, pp. 499-521. doi:10.1080/00268977600103251 [9] R. A. Toth and J. W. Brault, “Line Positions and Strengths in the (001), (110) and (030) Bands of HDO,” Applied Optics, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1983, pp. 908-926. doi:10.1364/AO.22.000908 [10] C. Camy-Peyret and J. M. Flaud, “Line Positions and In- tensities in the υ2 band of H2 16O,” Molecular Physics, Vol. 32, 1976, pp. 523-537. doi:10.1080/00268977600103261 [11] O. N. Ulenikov, V. N. Cherepanov and A. B. Malikova, “On Analysis of the ν2 Band of the HTO Molecule,” Jour- nal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 146, No. 1, 1991, pp. 97-103. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(91)90373-I [12] R. A. Toth and J. W. Brault, “HD16O, HD18O, and HD17O Transition Frequencies and Strengths in the ν2 Bands,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Vol. 162, No. 1, 1993, pp. 20-40. doi:10.1006/jmsp.1993.1266 [13] http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/ [14] B. S. Ray, “Eigenvalues of an Asymmetrical Rotator,” Zeits- chrift für Physik, Vol. 78, 1932, pp. 74-91. doi:10.1007/BF01342264 [15] P. R. Bunker, “Molecular Symmetry and Spectroscopy,” Academic Press, Waltham, 1979. [16] A. R. Edmonds, “Angular Momentum in Quantum Me- chanics,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1960. [17] R. S. Mulliken, “Species Classification and Rotational En- ergy Level Patterns of Non-Linear Triatomic Molecules,” Physical Reviews, Vol. 59, No. 11, 1941, pp. 873-889. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.59.873 [18] J. K. G. Watson, “Determination of Centrifugal Distortion Coefficients of Asymmetric-Top Molecules,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 46, No. 5, 1967, pp. 1935-1949. doi:10.1063/1.1840957 [19] J. K. G. Watson, “Determination of Centrifugal-Distor- tion Coefficients of Asymmetric-Top Molecules. II. Dreizler, Dendl, and Rudolph’s Results,” Journal of Chemical Phys- ics, Vol. 48, No. 1, 1968, pp. 181-185. doi:10.1063/1.1667898 [20] J. K. G. Watson, “Determination of Centrifugal Distortion Coefficients of Asymmetric-Top Molecules. III. Sextic Coefficients,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 48, No. 10, 1968, pp. 4517-4524. doi:10.1063/1.1668020 [21] P. Helminger, F. C. De Lucia, W. Gordy, P. A. Straats and H. W. Morgan, “Millimeter- and Submillimeter-Wave- length Spectra and Molecular Constants of HTO and DTO,” Physical Review A, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1974, pp. 1072-1081. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.10.1072 [22] E. B. Wilson, J. C. Decius and P. C. Cross, “Molecular Vibration. The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra,” McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1955. [23] J. M. Flaud and C. Camy-Peyret, “Vibration-Rotation In- tensities in H2O-Type Molecules Application to the 2ν2, ν1, and ν3 bands of H2 16O,” Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, Vol. 55, No. 1-3, 1975, pp. 278-310. doi:10.1016/0022-2852(75)90270-2 |














